home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
Text File | 1993-10-21 | 115.3 KB | 3,187 lines |
-
- Internet Draft ATM Management Objects October 19, 1993
-
-
- Definitions of Managed Objects
- for ATM Management
- Version 2.0
-
- October 19, 1993
-
-
- Masuma Ahmed (editor)
- Kaj Tesink (editor)
- Bell Communications Research
- 331 Newman Springs Road
- Red Bank, NJ 07701
-
- mxa@mail.bellcore.com
- kaj@cc.bellcore.com
-
-
-
-
-
-
- 1. Status of this Memo
-
- This document is an Internet Draft. Internet Drafts are
- working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force
- (IETF), its Areas, and its Working Groups. Note that other
- groups may also distribute working documents as Internet
- Drafts.
-
- Internet Drafts are valid for a maximum of six months and may
- be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
- time. It is inappropriate to use Internet Drafts as reference
- material or to cite them other than as a "working draft" or
- "work in progress".
-
- Please check the I-D abstract listing contained in each
- Internet Draft directory to learn the current status of this
- or any other Internet Draft.
-
- Distribution of this document is unlimited.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Masuma Ahmed and Kaj Tesink (editors) Expires 4/19/94 [Page 1]
-
-
-
-
-
- Internet Draft ATM Management Objects October 19, 1993
-
-
- 2. Abstract
-
- This memo defines an experimental portion of the Management
- Information Base (MIB) for use with network management
- protocols in TCP/IP-based internets. In particular, it
- defines objects for managing ATM-based interfaces, networks
- and services.
-
- This memo specifies a MIB module in a manner that is both
- compliant to the SNMPv2 SMI, and semantically identical to the
- peer SNMPv1 definitions.
-
- [Temporary Note: Upon progression of this specification as a
- Proposed Standard, an SNMPv2 and an SNMPv1 version of this MIB
- module will be made available to ease migration.]
-
- This memo does not specify a standard for the Internet
- community.
-
- 3. Change Log
-
- This section tracks changes made to the revisions of the
- Internet Drafts of this document. It will be deleted when the
- document is published as an RFC.
-
- The following changes were made for the version of the
- document dated August 9, 1993.
-
- - Representation of the ATM layer in the Interface
- Group has been modified as follows:
- The ATM layer objects are now represented using
- the fixedLengthGroup in the ifTable. The objects
- supported are ifIndex, ifDescr, ifType, ifSpeed,
- ifPhyAddress, ifAdminStatus, ifOperStatus, ifLastChange,
- ifInOctets, ifInErrors, ifInUnknownProtos, ifSpecific,
- ifName, ifLinkUpDownTrapEnable, ifHighSpeed, ifHCInOctets,
- and ifHCOutOctets. The ifPacketGroup does not apply
- to ATM layer.
-
- - The performance parameter group per virtual link has been removed.
-
- - The object atmInterfaceSpecific
- has been deleted from the atmInterfaceConfTable.
-
- - There was an error in the atmInterfaceTrafficEnforcementTypes
-
-
-
-
-
- Masuma Ahmed and Kaj Tesink (editors) Expires 4/19/94 [Page 2]
-
-
-
-
-
- Internet Draft ATM Management Objects October 19, 1993
-
-
- which was corrected.
-
- - AAL3/4 and AAL5 are now represented as
- separate entries in the ifTable.
- The value of the ifType for AAL3/4 Common Part
- Convergence Sublayer (CPCS) is the
- ifType of the SMDS Interface Protocol (SIP). The
- AAL3/4 CPCS layer objects are represented
- using the SIP MIB, RFC 1304.
-
- - The value of the ifType for AAL5 is 49. The
- representation of AAL5 using ifTable and in the
- ATM MIB is currently under study and will be
- included in the future.
-
- - The SONET Transmission Convergence (TC) sublayer is renamed
- as TC sublayer. This is because TC sublayer can be used for
- carrying ATM directly over SONET as well as directly
- over DS3 or DS1 physical layers.
-
-
- The following changes were made for the version of the
- document dated July 15, 1993.
-
- - This MIB module is made compliant with SNMPv2 SMI.
-
- - This MIB module incorporates the changes agreed upon at the
- AToM MIB WG meeting in Amsterdam.
-
- - The objects atmInterfacePortIdentifier,
- atmInterfaceTransmissionType and
- atmInterfaceMediaType have been deleted from the
- atmInterfaceConfTable. The object atmInterfaceIlmiVpiVci
- has been clarified.
-
- - Entries in the ifTable have been updated for ATM interface,
- and AAL level interfaces.
-
- - Representations of the AAL level interfaces in the Interface Group
- have been modified as follows:
- The AAL level is now represented per ATM interface and
- not per virtual connection. Therefore, the AAL
- pointer group is deleted.
- AAL3/4 and AAL5 CPCS layers are now combined and represented as
- a single entry in the Interface Group.
-
-
-
-
-
- Masuma Ahmed and Kaj Tesink (editors) Expires 4/19/94 [Page 3]
-
-
-
-
-
- Internet Draft ATM Management Objects October 19, 1993
-
-
- AAl1 SAR layer is also now represented in the Interface Group.
-
- - Formal conformance statements have beed added.
-
-
- 4. The SNMPv2 Network Management Framework
-
- The SNMPv2 Network Management Framework consists of four major
- components. They are:
-
-
- RFC 1442 which defines the SMI, the mechanisms used for
- describing and naming objects for the purpose of
- management.
-
- RFC 1213 defines MIB-II, the core set of managed objects
- for the Internet suite of protocols.
-
- RFC 1445 which defines the administrative and other
- architectural aspects of the framework.
-
- RFC 1448 which defines the protocol used for network
- access to managed objects.
-
- The Framework permits new objects to be defined for the
- purpose of experimentation and evaluation.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Masuma Ahmed and Kaj Tesink (editors) Expires 4/19/94 [Page 4]
-
-
-
-
-
- Internet Draft ATM Management Objects October 19, 1993
-
-
- 5. Objects
-
- Managed objects are accessed via a virtual information store,
- termed the Management Information Base or MIB. Objects in the
- MIB are defined using the subset of Abstract Syntax Notation
- One (ASN.1) [3] defined in the SMI. In particular, each
- object has a name, a syntax, and an encoding. The name is an
- OBJECT IDENTIFIER, an administratively assigned name, which
- specifies an object type. The object type together with an
- object instance serves to uniquely identify a specific
- instantiation of the object. For human convenience, we often
- use a textual string, termed the descriptor, to also refer to
- the object type.
-
- The syntax of an object type defines the abstract data
- structure corresponding to that object type. The ASN.1
- language is used for this purpose. However, the SMI RFC 1442
- purposely restricts the ASN.1 constructs which may be used.
- These restrictions are explicitly made for simplicity.
-
- The encoding of an object type is simply how that object type
- is represented using the object type's syntax. Implicitly
- tied to the notion of an object type's syntax and encoding is
- how the object type is represented when being transmitted on
- the network. The SMI specifies the use of the basic encoding
- rules of ASN.1 [4], subject to the additional requirements
- imposed by the SNMPv2.
-
- 5.1. Format of Definitions
-
- Section 9 contains the specification of all object types
- contained in this MIB module. The object types are defined
- using the conventions defined in the SNMPv2 SMI.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Masuma Ahmed and Kaj Tesink (editors) Expires 4/19/94 [Page 5]
-
-
-
-
-
- Internet Draft ATM Management Objects October 19, 1993
-
-
- 6. ATM Terminology
-
- Some basic ATM terminologies are described in this section to
- facilitate defining the ATM managed objects and ATM management
- groups.
-
-
- 6.1. VCL/VPL and VCC/VPC
-
- There are two distinct types of ATM virtual connections:
- Virtual Channel Connections (VCCs) and Virtual Path Connection
- (VPCs). As shown in the figures below, ATM virtual
- connections are made of virtual links such as Virtual Channel
- Links (VCLs) or Virtual Path Links (VPLs). The VCI/VPI or VPI
- field in the ATM cell header associates each cell with a
- particular VCL or VPL over a given physical link.
-
-
- <-----------------------VCC------------------------------->
- ---------- ----------
- | ATM | | ATM |
- | | | |
- O<------->|Switch |<-------------->|Switch |<------------>O
- VCL1 | | VCL2 | | VCL3
- ---------- ----------
- <---a managed segment-->
- <------------------a managed segment----------------------->
-
-
- Figure 1: Virtual Channel Links and Virtual Channel Connection
-
- As shown in Figure 1, end-to-end VCCs are created by the
- concatenation of VCLs. This is a path composed of more than
- once VCL spanning multiple network nodes to form a connection
- between two end-points. The VCLs used to form a VCC all have
- the same traffic characteristics (i.e., bandwidth parameters,
- QoS Class parameters, etc.). The switch routes cells between
- VCLs, thereby, forming VCCs across the network. The VCCs are
- bi-directional by definition. However, the traffic parameters
- in two directions of the connection can be symmetric or
- asymmetric, i.e., the two directions of the virtual connection
- can have the same or different traffic flows. Therefore, a
- uni-directional traffic flow across a VCC is achieved by
- assigning a zero bandwidth in one direction.
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Masuma Ahmed and Kaj Tesink (editors) Expires 4/19/94 [Page 6]
-
-
-
-
-
- Internet Draft ATM Management Objects October 19, 1993
-
-
- An ATM equipment (e.g., a router, switch or network) typically
- does not support a VCC end-to-end, but only a segment of the
- VCC (see Figure 1). Therefore, the managed resource is
- typically a VCC segment and the management of an end-to-end
- VCC is achieved by appropriate management of its individual
- components.
-
- Many VCLs may be carried within a single VPL. All VCLs within
- a single VPL share the same VPI value in the ATM header. In
- turn, several VPLs can be carried over a single physical link.
-
-
-
- <-----------------------VPC----------------------------->
- ---------- ----------
- | ATM | | ATM |
- VCCs | | | |
- <--|---------|Switch |----------------|Switch |----------|-->
- <--| | | | | |-->
- <--|---------| |----------------| |----------|-->
- VPL1 ---------- VPL2 ---------- VPL3
-
- <---------a managed segment--------->
- <-------------------a managed segment------------------->
-
-
- Figure 2: Virtual Path Links and Virtual Path Connection
-
- End-to-end VPCs are created by the concatenation of VPLs and
- may be viewed as a logical bundle of VCCs as shown in Figure
- 2. An end-to-end VPC may be used by a user to group all those
- VCCs going to the same destination. The switch switches VPLs
- while ignoring the VCLs within it. Thus, at the switching
- point, a translation is performed on the VPL identifier fields
- (i.e., the VPI) in the ATM cell header. The VPI field does
- not have end-to-end significance over the entire VPC. Note
- that, for a switch or network supporting a VPC, only the VCI
- value has end-to-end significance since the switch or the
- network does not process the VCI field. Therefore, in the
- context of a given switch or network, VPC and VCC are non-
- overlapping virtual connections.
-
- A switch or network typically does not support a VPC end-to-
- end, but only a segment of the VPC (see Figure 2). Therefore,
- in a switch or network, a managed resource is typically a VPC
-
-
-
-
-
- Masuma Ahmed and Kaj Tesink (editors) Expires 4/19/94 [Page 7]
-
-
-
-
-
- Internet Draft ATM Management Objects October 19, 1993
-
-
- segment and the management of an end-to-end VPC is achieved by
- appropriate management of its individual components.
-
-
- 6.2. PVC and SVC
-
- A Permanent Virtual Connection (PVC) is a provisioned VCC or
- VPC. A Switched Virtual Connection (SVC) is a switched VCC or
- VPC that is set up in real-time via call set-up signaling
- procedures. A PVC (or an SVC) can be a point-to-point,
- point-to-multipoint, or multipoint-to-multipoint VCC or VPC.
-
-
- 6.3. Traffic Management Parameters
-
- 6.3.1. Traffic Policing and Traffic Shaping Parameters
-
- In order to allocate resources fairly among different users,
- it is usually necessary to police traffic at different
- resource access points. The traffic enforcement or policing
- taken at a UNI is called Usage Parameter Control (UPC) and is
- activated on an incoming VCL or VPL as shown in Figure 3. The
- use of the traffic enforcer at the ingress of the connection
- is to make sure that the user traffic does not exceed the
- negotiated traffic parameters such as the peak cell rate.
-
-
- ---------- ----------
- UNI | ATM | NNI | ATM | UNI
- | | switch | | | switch | |
- O<---|---->X(UPC) |<-------|--------->| (UPC)X<------|--->O
- | VCL | | | VCL | | VCL |
- ---------- ----------
-
-
- Figure 3: An Example of a UPC
-
- In addition, traffic shaping may be performed on an outgoing
- VPL or VCL at a given ATM interface. The function of the ATM
- traffic shaper at the egress of the connection is to smooth
- the outgoing cell traffic inter-arrival time. If policing or
- shaping is not performed then the policing or shaping
- parameters are zero.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Masuma Ahmed and Kaj Tesink (editors) Expires 4/19/94 [Page 8]
-
-
-
-
-
- Internet Draft ATM Management Objects October 19, 1993
-
-
- 6.3.2. Cell Loss Priority
-
- To prioritize traffic during resource congestion, ATM cells
- are assigned one of the two types of Cell Loss Priority (CLP),
- CLP=0 and CLP=1. ATM cells with CLP=0 are treated as higher
- priority traffic than ATM cells with CLP=1.
-
-
- 6.3.3. QoS Class
-
- A VCC or VPC is associated with one of a number of Quality of
- Service (QoS) classes. Four QoS classes have been specified
- to support service class A (constant bit rate video and
- circuit emulation), service class B (variable bit rate
- video/audio), service class C (connection-oriented data) and
- service class D (connectionless data). The VCLs (or VPLs)
- concatenated to form a VCC (or VPC) will all have the same QoS
- class as that of the VCC (or VPC). Note that, the cell loss
- ratio, Cell Delay Variation (CDV), and end-to-end cell delay
- parameters are defined as part of QoS Class definition.
-
-
- 7. Overview
-
- ATM management objects are used to manage ATM interfaces and
- ATM virtual connection segments supported by a switch, host,
- or network. This section provides an overview and background
- of how to use this MIB and other potential MIBs for this
- purpose.
-
- The purpose of this memo is primarily to manage ATM PVCs.
- Management of ATM SVCs may require additional capabilities
- which are currently outside the scope of this memo.
-
-
- 7.1. Background
-
- The ATM MIB shall be used for ATM Customer Network Management
- (CNM) and ATM Network Management (NM) purposes for managing
- ATM interfaces and ATM virtual connections. Anything inside a
- switch or network is invisible and therefore shall not be
- manageable by the ATM MIB. The ATM MIB shall support
- configuration, fault, and performance management of:
-
- (1) ATM interfaces
-
-
-
-
-
- Masuma Ahmed and Kaj Tesink (editors) Expires 4/19/94 [Page 9]
-
-
-
-
-
- Internet Draft ATM Management Objects October 19, 1993
-
-
-
- (2) ATM virtual connections
-
- In addition, other MIB modules are necessary to manage ATM
- interfaces and connections. Examples include MIB II for
- general system and interface management, the DS3 or SONET MIBs
- for management of physical interfaces, and, as appropriate,
- MIB modules for applications that make use of ATM, such as
- SMDS. These MIB modules are outside the scope of this
- specification.
-
- The current specification of this ATM MIB is based on SNMPv2.
-
- 7.2. Structure of the MIB
-
- The managed ATM objects are arranged into the following groups
- for management of (1) ATM local interfaces and (2) ATM virtual
- connections. For a switch or network that terminates or
- originates VCCs, the management of ATM local interfaces also
- includes management of ATM adaptation layers for ATM
- applications. In addition, managed ATM objects for
- activation/deactivation of OAM cell flows and ATM traps
- notifying virtual connection or virtual link failures such as
- VP-AIS may be needed and are under study.
-
- (1) ATM interface configuration group
- (2) ATM interface DS3 PLCP group
- (3) ATM interface TC Sublayer group
- (4) ATM Virtual Connection Segment (VPC/VCC) groups
-
- The groups listed above are the basic units of conformance. If
- the semantics of a group are applicable to an implementation,
- then it must implement all objects in that group. For
- example, a managed agent must implement the VCC group if and
- only if it manages the VCCs.
-
-
- 7.3. ATM Interface Configuration Group
-
- This group is designed to manage ATM cell layer configuration
- of local ATM interfaces on an ATM device. In addition, this
- group provides pointers to any additional MIB modules (e.g.,
- enterprise-specific) that may be needed to manage this
- interface.
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Masuma Ahmed and Kaj Tesink (editors) Expires 4/19/94[Page 10]
-
-
-
-
-
- Internet Draft ATM Management Objects October 19, 1993
-
-
- 7.4. ATM Interface DS3 PLCP and TC Layer Groups
-
- These groups provide performance statistics of the DS3 PLCP
- and TC sublayer of local ATM interfaces on a managed ATM
- device. DS3 PLCP and TC sublayer are currently used to carry
- ATM cells respectively over DS3 and SONET transmission paths.
-
- 7.5. ATM Virtual Connection Segment Groups
-
- 7.5.1. Introduction
-
- In these groups, managed segments of virtual connections are
- modeled as a set of unidirectional traffic flows between an
- ingress and an egress of a switch or network (see Figure 4).
- This allows for independent treatment of the forward and
- backward traffic flows of virtual connections, and allows for
- the management of all possible topologies (pt/pt, pt/mpt,
- mpt/mpt).
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Masuma Ahmed and Kaj Tesink (editors) Expires 4/19/94[Page 11]
-
-
-
-
-
- Internet Draft ATM Management Objects October 19, 1993
-
-
-
- Managed Resource Managed Resource
- Ingress___________________________________Egress
- _________________| >> Virtual Connection traffic >> |______________
- |__________________________________|
-
-
- Figure 4 - Model unidirectional traffic flow
-
- The In and Out in this model necessarily differs from the
- model in the ifTable of MIB II, where the In/Out is measured
- at the same port. The relationship is shown in Figure 5.
-
- Port x
- __________________________/
- LocalIn--> (Ingress XtoY)| >> XtoY traffic >> /
- ____________________________| ________________________/
- LocalOut<-- (Egress YtoX)| << YtoX traffic << /
- |________________________/
-
-
- Figure 5 - Relation Local In/Out with Virtual Connection Ingress/Egress
-
-
- Each Ingress-Egress flow is represented as a separate entry in
- the atmConnectionTables. This approach accommodates
- unidirectional, bidirectional, point-to-point, point-to-
- multipoint, and multipoint-to-multipoint topologies. It also
- allows for efficient searching by port number. For example, a
- bidirectional point-to-point virtual connection between port 1
- and port 2 is represented by the entries:
- {Port1VCx-Port2VCy}
- {Port2VCy-Port1VCx}
-
- Similarly, a bidirectional point-to-multipoint virtual
- connection from port 1 to ports 2 and 3, is represented by the
- entries:
- {Port1VCx-Port2VCy}
- {Port1VCx-Port3VCz}
- {Port2VCy-Port1VCx}
- {Port3VCz-Port1VCx}
-
- A bidirectional multipoint-to-multipoint virtual connection
- between ports 1, 2, and 3 is represented by the entries:
- {Port1VCx-Port2VCy}
-
-
-
-
-
- Masuma Ahmed and Kaj Tesink (editors) Expires 4/19/94[Page 12]
-
-
-
-
-
- Internet Draft ATM Management Objects October 19, 1993
-
-
- {Port1VCx-Port3VCz}
- {Port2VCy-Port1VCx}
- {Port2VCy-Port3VCz}
- {Port3VCz-Port1VCx}
- {Port3VCz-Port2VCy}
-
-
- A unidirectional multicast from port 1 to ports 2, 3, and 4
- ports 1, 2, and 3 is represented by the entries:
- {Port1VCx-Port2VCy}
- {Port1VCx-Port3VCz}
- {Port1VCx-Port4VCw}
-
- The purpose of atmConnectionTable is to specify for each
- managed virtual connection segment supported by the ATM
- equipment (e.g., a router, switch or network):
- 1) Its identifier at the ingress
- 2) Its identifier at the egress
- 3) The characterization of the virtual connection.
-
- 7.5.2. Virtual Connection Identifiers at Ingress and Egress
-
- The virtual connection identifiers at ingress and egress of
- the ATM equipment must be locally unique to the equipment.
- For VCCs, this is achieved by the tuples:
- {atmVCConnectionIngressPort, atmVCConnectionIngressVpi,
- atmVCConnectionIngressVci}, and
- {atmVCConnectionEgressPort, atmVCConnectionEgressVpi,
- atmVCConnectionEgressVci}
-
- For VPCs, this is achieved by the tuples:
- {atmVCConnectionIngressPort, atmVCConnectionIngressVpi}, and
- {atmVCConnectionEgressPort, atmVCConnectionEgressVpi}
-
-
- 7.5.3. Virtual Connection Characterization
-
- A virtual connection segment is characterized by the following
- parameters:
-
- Status: status of the virtual connection segment,
- Quality of Service (QoS): specifying performance objectives
- for the virtual connection segment,
- Traffic policer: specifying the traffic enforcement policy
- at the ingress of the virtual connection segment, and
-
-
-
-
-
- Masuma Ahmed and Kaj Tesink (editors) Expires 4/19/94[Page 13]
-
-
-
-
-
- Internet Draft ATM Management Objects October 19, 1993
-
-
- Traffic shaper: specifying the traffic enforcement policy
- at the egress of the virtual connection segment.
-
-
- 7.5.4. Sets
-
- Requests for new virtual connections, discontinuation of
- existing virtual connections, and modifications of existing
- virtual connections are accommodated by proper use of the
- atmConnectionTableEntryStatus column. The structure of the
- atmConnectionTableEntry allows to request and fully qualify
- new connections by a single set operation. The status column
- follows the textual convention RowStatus defined in [RFC1443].
-
- [Needs text specifying its use under SNMPv1].
-
- Not all managed resources may support sets for this table.
- Furthermore, sets on the individual columns are only supported
- within the range of values, supported by the ATM equipment.
-
- The set capability shall only be supported for PVCs. SVCs are
- set up via appropriate call signaling procedures.
-
- The creation of one or more rows in this table has the
- following effects:
- - A virtual connection of the specified type, and with the specified
- qualifications shall be provisioned,
- - Associated entries in the local interface tables shall be created.
-
- The following constraints apply to virtual connection
- modifications:
-
- [text to be provided. there are probably cases where one
- cannot do certain modifications. For example, can one change
- a unidirectional PVC to a bidirectional one? Can one change
- the QoS of an existing virtual connection? And so on.]
-
- For some ATM equipments, requests for changes in the virtual
- connection table may be honored after a period of time, due to
- provisioning activities. SNMPv2 provides the means to
- accommodate it [RFC1441-1452]. However, management under
- SNMPv1 does not accommodate these needs.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Masuma Ahmed and Kaj Tesink (editors) Expires 4/19/94[Page 14]
-
-
-
-
-
- Internet Draft ATM Management Objects October 19, 1993
-
-
- 7.5.5. Virtual Connection Association with Interface
- Addresses
-
- Interface addresses may not be typically freely allocated, and
- are usually assigned by the provider of the switch or network
- (e.g., the public service provider in case of a public
- network). Furthermore, addresses may be assigned without
- virtual connections being established. Therefore, these
- addresses appear in the local interface tables, and not in the
- atmConnectionTable.
-
-
- 7.5.6. Management of an End-to-End Virtual Connection
-
- [to be supplied - text explaining that one needs to figure out
- which switches or networks/managed VC segments take part in
- the virtual connection, and that one needs to string the
- virtual connection table info of each of those segments
- together if one wants to know the whole story]
-
-
- 8. Application of MIB II to ATM
-
- 8.1. The System Group
-
- This specifies how the System Group defined in MIB II shall be
- used for ATM agent/proxy agent. For ATM switches or ATM
- networks, the sysServices object in the System Group has the
- value "2" which implies that the ATM switch, host or network
- is providing a subnetwork level service.
-
-
- 8.2. The Interface Group
-
- This specifies how the Interfaces Group defined in MIB II
- shall be used for the management of ATM based interfaces, and
- in conjunction with the ATM MIB modules. This memo assumes the
- interpretation of the Interfaces group to be in accordance
- with [5] which states that the interfaces table (ifTable)
- contains information on the managed resource's interfaces and
- each sub-layer below the internetwork layer of a network
- interface is considered an interface. Thus, the ifTable
- allows the following ATM-based interfaces to be represented as
- table entries:
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Masuma Ahmed and Kaj Tesink (editors) Expires 4/19/94[Page 15]
-
-
-
-
-
- Internet Draft ATM Management Objects October 19, 1993
-
-
- - ATM cell level interfaces in the ATM equipments (e.g.,
- switches, hosts, routers or networks) with ATM interfaces.
- This level is concerned with generic cell counts and
- not with individual virtual connections.
-
-
- In accordance with the guidelines of ifTable, cell counts per
- virtual connection are not covered by ifTable, and is
- considered interface specific. In order to interrelate the
- ifEntries properly, the Interfaces Stack Group defined in [5]
- shall be supported.
-
-
- 8.2.1. Support of the ATM Cell Layer by ifTable
-
- Some specific interpretations of ifTable for the ATM cell
- layer follow.
-
- Object Use for the generic ATM layer.
- ifIndex Each ATM port is represented by an ifEntry.
- ifDescr Description of the ATM interface.
- ifType The value that is allocated for ATM is 37.
- ifSpeed The total bandwidth in bits per second
- for use by the ATM layer.
- ifPhysAddress The address for this interface. If an interface has
- multiple addresses, then this is its primary
- address. If an interface has no addresses, then
- this is an octet string of zero length.
- ifAdminStatus See [5].
- ifOperStatus Assumes the value down(2) if the ATM cell layer or
- any layer below that layer is down.
- ifLastChange See [5].
- ifInOctets The number of received octets over the
- interface, i.e., the number of received,
- assigned cells multiplied by 53.
- ifOutOctets The number of transmitted octets over the
- interface, i.e., the number of transmitted,
- assigned cells multiplied by 53.
- ifInErrors The number of cells dropped due to
- uncorrectable HEC errors.
- ifInUnknownProtos The number of received cells discarded
- during cell header validation, including
- cells with unrecognized VPI/VCI values,
- and cells with invalid cell header patterns.
- If cells with undefined PTI values are discarded,
-
-
-
-
-
- Masuma Ahmed and Kaj Tesink (editors) Expires 4/19/94[Page 16]
-
-
-
-
-
- Internet Draft ATM Management Objects October 19, 1993
-
-
- they are also counted here.
- ifOutErrors See [5]. For implementation strategies
- in which no output errors can occur at the ATM
- layer, this will always be 0."
- ifSpecific Set to the OBJECT IDENTIFIER { experimental 41 }.
- [Ed.note to be changed to { transmission 37 } when
- this specification is put on the IETF standards
- track]
- ifName Textual name of the interface or an octet string
- of zero length.
- ifLinkUpDownTrapEnable Default is disabled (2).
- ifHighSpeed See [5]; supported if required by the compliance
- statements in [5].
- ifHCInOctets The 64-bit version of ifInOctets; supported
- if required by the compliance statements in [5].
- ifHCOutOctets The 64-bit version of ifOutOctets; supported
- if required by the compliance statements in [5].
-
-
- 8.2.2. Support of the AAL3/4 by RFC 1304
-
- The AAL3/4 CPCS layer is represented using the SMDS Interface
- Protocol (SIP) L3 table in the SIP MIB, RFC1304. For the
- management of AAL3/4 CPCS layer, all objects in the SIP L3
- table are supported.
-
-
- 8.2.3. Support of the AAL5 by ifTable and the ATM MIB
-
- To be provided.
-
-
-
- 9. ILMI MIB and The ATM Managed Objects
-
- The ILMI MIB is specified by the ATM Forum in UNI
- specification document [11], to manage local ATM UNIs. The
- support of the ATM management functions by the ILMI MIB and
- the ATM MIB are compared in Table 1. In the table below,
- "yes" in ILMI column indicates that the management functions
- are supported by the ILMI MIB. The MIB groups in the ATM MIB
- column are the groups listed in Section 6.2.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Masuma Ahmed and Kaj Tesink (editors) Expires 4/19/94[Page 17]
-
-
-
-
-
- Internet Draft ATM Management Objects October 19, 1993
-
-
- Table 1 - Structuring of ATM Managed Objects
-
- ______________________________________________________________________
- | | | |
- ATM Mgmt.Inf. |ATM Managed Objects |This memo |ILMI MIB|
- ______________|_________________________________|___________|________|
-
- Local Interface Information:
- _____________________________________________________________________
- ATM interface:| (1) port identifier | ATM | |
- physical layer| (2) physical transmission types | MIB gr.1* |yes |
- configuration | (3) operational status | MIB II | |
- | (4) administrative status | | |
- _____________________________________________________________________
- ATM interface:| (1) active VPI/VCI fields | ATM | |
- cell layer | (2) maximum number of VPCs/VCCs | MIB gr.1 |yes |
- configuration | (3) configured VPCs/VCCs | | |
- | (4) ILMI VPI/VCI value | | |
- | (5) additional MIB pointer | | |
- _____________________________________________________________________
- ATM interface:|(1) received/transmitted cells | | |
- cell layer |(2) errored cells | MIB II |yes |
- performance |(3) header content violations | | |
- _____________________________________________________________________
- ATM interface:|(1)DS3 PLCP severely errored | ATM | |
- PLCP & TC | framing seconds | MIB gr.2,3| |
- layer |(2)DS3 PLCP unavailable seconds | |no |
- performance |(3)DS3 PLCP alarm state | | |
- |(4)out of cell delineation events| | |
- |(5)TC alarm state | | |
-
- _____________________________________________________________________
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Masuma Ahmed and Kaj Tesink (editors) Expires 4/19/94[Page 18]
-
-
-
-
-
- Internet Draft ATM Management Objects October 19, 1993
-
-
- _____________________________________________________________________
- ATM interface:|(1)PDUs discarded for protocol | | |
- AAL5 CPCS | errors | MIB II |no |
- layers |(2)PDUs discarded for procedural | | |
- | or transmission errors | | |
- |(3)received/transmitted PDUs | | |
- _____________________________________________________________________
- Virtual Connection Information:
- _____________________________________________________________________
- Comments: |(1)port identifier of ingress | | |
- | end | | |
- Virtual |(2)port identifier of egress |ATM | |
- connection | end |MIB gr. 4 |no |
- information |(3)VPI or VPI/VCI value | | |
- are provided | of ingress VCL/VPL | | |
- for each |(4)VPI or VPI/VCI value of | | |
- direction | egress VCL/VPL | | |
- of the |(5)policing parameters of | | |
- connection. | ingress VCL/VPL | | |
- |(6)shaping parameters of | | |
- | egress VCL/VPL | | |
- |(7)QoS class of ingress | | |
- | VCL/VPL | | |
- |(8)VCC/VPC operational status | | |
- |(9)VCC/VPC administrative status | | |
- _____________________________________________________________________
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Masuma Ahmed and Kaj Tesink (editors) Expires 4/19/94[Page 19]
-
-
-
-
-
- Internet Draft ATM Management Objects October 19, 1993
-
-
- *The operational and administrative status of the ATM
- interface and the physical transmission type shall be
- supported by the interface table in MIB II.
-
- **The ILMI MIB contains local and end-to-end operational
- status of the VPC/VCC. However, it does not contain the
- administrative status of the local VPC/VCC. Also, the ILMI
- MIB contains policing parameters, shaping parameters and QoS
- class as local information and not as virtual connection
- information.
-
- The table 1 shows that the ILMI MIB supports most of the ATM
- functions that are supported by the ATM MIB groups 1, 4, and
- interface group in MIB II. The ILMI MIB contains the QoS
- Class, traffic policing and shaping parameters as the local
- interface information. This specification supports these
- functions in the virtual connection group to facilitate
- setting up or modifying virtual connections. This approach
- does not change the semantics of these variables, only the
- OBJECT IDENTIFIERs of these variables change.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Masuma Ahmed and Kaj Tesink (editors) Expires 4/19/94[Page 20]
-
-
-
-
-
- Internet Draft ATM Management Objects October 19, 1993
-
-
- 10. Object Definitions
-
- ATM-MIB DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN
-
- IMPORTS
- MODULE-IDENTITY, OBJECT-TYPE, experimental,
- Counter32, Integer32
- FROM SNMPv2-SMI
- DisplayString, RowStatus
- FROM SNMPv2-TC
- MODULE-COMPLIANCE, OBJECT-GROUP
- FROM SNMPv2-CONF;
-
-
-
- atmMIB MODULE-IDENTITY
- LAST-UPDATED "9310191445Z"
- ORGANIZATION "IETF AToM MIB Working Group"
- CONTACT-INFO
- "
- Masuma Ahmed
- Bellcore
- 331 Newman Springs Road
- Red Bank, NJ 07701
- Tel: 908-758-2515
- Fax: 908-758-4192
- E-mail: mxa@mail.bellcore.com
-
- Kaj Tesink
- Bellcore
- 331 Newman Springs Road
- Red Bank, NJ 07701
- Tel: 908-758-5254
- Fax: 908-758-4196
- E-mail: kaj@cc.bellcore.com"
- DESCRIPTION
- "This is the MIB Module for ATM-related
- objects for managing ATM interfaces and
- ATM connections."
- ::= { experimental 41 }
-
- atmMIBObjects OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {atmMIB 1}
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Masuma Ahmed and Kaj Tesink (editors) Expires 4/19/94[Page 21]
-
-
-
-
-
- Internet Draft ATM Management Objects October 19, 1993
-
-
- -- This ATM MIB Module consists of the following groups:
- -- (1) ATM Interface configuration group
- -- (2) ATM Interface DS3 PLCP group
- -- (3) ATM Interface TC Sublayer group
- -- (4) ATM VPC group
- -- (5) ATM VCC group
-
- IfIndex ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "The value of this object identifies the interface
- for which the entry contains management information.
- The value of this object for a particular interface
- has the same value as the ifIndex object, defined
- in RFC 1156 and RFC 1213, for the same interface."
- SYNTAX Integer32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Masuma Ahmed and Kaj Tesink (editors) Expires 4/19/94[Page 22]
-
-
-
-
-
- Internet Draft ATM Management Objects October 19, 1993
-
-
- atmInterfaceTrafficEnforcementTypes OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::=
- {atmMIBObjects 1}
-
- -- The following values are defined for use as
- -- possible values of the type of Traffic Enforcement.
- -- It is assumed that the same algorithms will be
- -- used for traffic policing and shaping.
- -- Seven types of traffic enforcement have been
- -- specified so far by the ATM Forum UNI Specification,
- -- Draft 2.3, including one for the best effort traffic.
- -- The types of traffic policing and shaping
-
- atmInterfaceNoTrafficEnforcement OBJECT-IDENTITY
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "This identifies the no ATM traffic enforcement type.
- Parameters 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 are not used."
- ::= { atmInterfaceTrafficEnforcementTypes 1}
-
- atmInterfaceTrafficEnforcementType1 OBJECT-IDENTITY
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "This identifies the ATM traffic enforcement type 1:
- Parameter 1: CLP=0+1 peak rate (cells per second)
- Parameter 2: not used
- Parameter 3: not used
- Parameter 4: not used
- Parameter 5: not used."
- ::= { atmInterfaceTrafficEnforcementTypes 2}
-
- atmInterfaceTrafficEnforcementType2 OBJECT-IDENTITY
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "This identifies the ATM traffic enforcement type 2:
- Parameter 1: CLP=0 peak rate (cells per second)
- Parameter 2: CLP=0+1 peak rate (cells per second)
- Parameter 3: not used
- Parameter 4: not used
- Parameter 5: not used."
- ::= { atmInterfaceTrafficEnforcementTypes 3}
-
- atmInterfaceTrafficEnforcementType3 OBJECT-IDENTITY
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "This identifies the ATM traffic enforcement type 3:
-
-
-
-
-
- Masuma Ahmed and Kaj Tesink (editors) Expires 4/19/94[Page 23]
-
-
-
-
-
- Internet Draft ATM Management Objects October 19, 1993
-
-
- Parameter 1: CLP=0+1 peak rate (cells per second)
- Parameter 2: CLP=0 sustained rate (cells per second)
- Parameter 3: CLP=0 maximum burst size (cells)
- Parameter 4: not used
- Parameter 5: not used."
- ::= { atmInterfaceTrafficEnforcementTypes 4}
-
- atmInterfaceTrafficEnforcementType4 OBJECT-IDENTITY
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "This identifies the ATM traffic enforcement type 4:
- Parameter 1: CLP=0 peak rate (cells per second)
- Parameter 2: CLP=0+1 peak rate (cells per second)
- Parameter 3: tagging (e.g., a value 1 may be
- used to indicate tagging)
- Parameter 4: not used
- Parameter 5: not used."
- ::= { atmInterfaceTrafficEnforcementTypes 5}
-
- atmInterfaceTrafficEnforcementType5 OBJECT-IDENTITY
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "This identifies the ATM traffic enforcement type 5:
- Parameter 1: CLP=0+1 peak rate (cells per second)
- Parameter 2: CLP=0 sustained rate (cells per second)
- Parameter 3: CLP=0 maximum burst size (cells)
- Parameter 4: tagging (e.g., a value 1 may be
- used to indicate tagging)
- Parameter 5: not used."
- ::= { atmInterfaceTrafficEnforcementTypes 6}
-
- atmInterfaceTrafficEnforcementType6 OBJECT-IDENTITY
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "This identifies the ATM traffic enforcement type 6:
- Parameter 1: CLP=0+1 peak rate (cells per second)
- Parameter 2: CLP=0+1 sustained rate (cells per second)
- Parameter 3: CLP=0+1 maximum burst size (cells)
- Parameter 4: not used
- Parameter 5: not used."
- ::= { atmInterfaceTrafficEnforcementTypes 7}
-
- atmInterfaceTrafficEnforcementType7 OBJECT-IDENTITY
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
-
-
-
-
-
- Masuma Ahmed and Kaj Tesink (editors) Expires 4/19/94[Page 24]
-
-
-
-
-
- Internet Draft ATM Management Objects October 19, 1993
-
-
- "This identifies the ATM traffic enforcement type 7:
- Parameter 1: CLP=0+1 peak rate (cells per second)
- Parameter 2: best effort traffic (e.g., a value 1 may
- be used to indicate best effort traffic)
- Parameter 3: not used
- Parameter 4: not used
- Parameter 5: not used."
- ::= { atmInterfaceTrafficEnforcementTypes 8}
-
-
- -- ATM Interface Configuration Parameters Group
- -- Implementation of this group is mandatory
- -- if providing ATM Interfaces.
-
- atmInterfaceConfTable OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF AtmInterfaceConfEntry
- MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "This table contains ATM local interface configuration
- parameters and state variables, one
- entry per ATM interface port."
- ::= { atmMIBObjects 2 }
-
- atmInterfaceConfEntry OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX AtmInterfaceConfEntry
- MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "This list contains ATM interface configuration
- parameters and state variables."
- INDEX { atmInterfaceIndex }
- ::= { atmInterfaceConfTable 1}
-
- AtmInterfaceConfEntry ::= SEQUENCE {
- atmInterfaceIndex IfIndex,
- atmInterfaceMaxVpcs INTEGER,
- atmInterfaceMaxVccs INTEGER,
- atmInterfaceConfVpcs INTEGER,
- atmInterfaceConfVccs INTEGER,
- atmInterfaceMaxActiveVpiBits INTEGER,
- atmInterfaceMaxActiveVciBits INTEGER,
- atmInterfaceIlmiVpiVci Interger32
- }
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Masuma Ahmed and Kaj Tesink (editors) Expires 4/19/94[Page 25]
-
-
-
-
-
- Internet Draft ATM Management Objects October 19, 1993
-
-
- atmInterfaceIndex OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX IfIndex
- MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "The value of this object identifies the ATM port
- interface for which this entry contains
- management information."
- ::= { atmInterfaceConfEntry 1 }
-
- atmInterfaceMaxVpcs OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX INTEGER (0..255)
- MAX-ACCESS read-only
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "The maximum number of VPCs supported at
- this ATM interface."
- ::= { atmInterfaceConfEntry 2}
-
- atmInterfaceMaxVccs OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX INTEGER (0..65535)
- MAX-ACCESS read-only
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "The maximum number of VCCs supported at
- the ATM interface."
- ::= { atmInterfaceConfEntry 3}
-
- atmInterfaceConfVpcs OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX INTEGER (0..255)
- MAX-ACCESS read-only
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "The number of VPCs configured for use
- at this ATM interface."
- ::= { atmInterfaceConfEntry 4}
-
- atmInterfaceConfVccs OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX INTEGER (0..65535)
- MAX-ACCESS read-only
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "The number of VCCs configured for use
- at the ATM interface."
- ::= { atmInterfaceConfEntry 5}
-
-
-
-
-
- Masuma Ahmed and Kaj Tesink (editors) Expires 4/19/94[Page 26]
-
-
-
-
-
- Internet Draft ATM Management Objects October 19, 1993
-
-
- atmInterfaceMaxActiveVpiBits OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX INTEGER (0..8)
- MAX-ACCESS read-only
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "The maximum number of active VPI bits
- configured for use at the ATM interface."
- ::= { atmInterfaceConfEntry 6}
-
- atmInterfaceMaxActiveVciBits OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX INTEGER (0..16)
- MAX-ACCESS read-only
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "The maximum number of active VCI bits
- configured for use at this ATM interface."
- ::= { atmInterfaceConfEntry 7}
-
- atmInterfaceIlmiVpiVci OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX Integer32
- MAX-ACCESS read-only
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "The decimal value of the three octet VPI/VCI
- field that identifies the VCC supporting
- the ILMI at the ATM interface.
- If the value of this object is greater
- than 16777215 then the ILMI is not supported
- at the ATM interface.
- The default VPI/VCI values for ILMI
- are VPI=0 and VCI=16."
- ::= { atmInterfaceConfEntry 8}
-
- -- The ATM Interface DS3 PLCP Group
-
- -- Implementation of this group is mandatory
- -- if the DS3 PLCP is implemented.
-
-
- atmInterfaceDs3PlcpTable OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF AtmInterfaceDs3PlcpEntry
- MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "This table contains ATM interface DS3 PLCP
-
-
-
-
-
- Masuma Ahmed and Kaj Tesink (editors) Expires 4/19/94[Page 27]
-
-
-
-
-
- Internet Draft ATM Management Objects October 19, 1993
-
-
- parameters and state variables, one entry per
- ATM interface port."
- ::= { atmMIBObjects 3}
-
- atmInterfaceDs3PlcpEntry OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX AtmInterfaceDs3PlcpEntry
- MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "This list contains DS3 PLCP parameters and
- state variables at the ATM interface."
- INDEX {atmInterfaceDs3PlcpIndex }
- ::= { atmInterfaceDs3PlcpTable 1}
-
- AtmInterfaceDs3PlcpEntry ::= SEQUENCE {
- atmInterfaceDs3PlcpIndex IfIndex,
- atmInterfaceDs3PlcpSEFSs Counter32,
- atmInterfaceDs3PlcpAlarmState INTEGER,
- atmInterfaceDs3PlcpUASs Counter32
- }
-
- atmInterfaceDs3PlcpIndex OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX IfIndex
- MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "The value of this object identifies the ATM
- interface port for which this entry
- contains management information and is the
- same as the atmInterfaceIndex."
- ::= { atmInterfaceDs3PlcpEntry 1}
-
- atmInterfaceDs3PlcpSEFSs OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX Counter32
- MAX-ACCESS read-only
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "A DS3 Severely Errored Framing Second (SEFS)
- is a count of one-second intervals
- containing one or more SEF event."
- ::= { atmInterfaceDs3PlcpEntry 2}
-
- atmInterfaceDs3PlcpAlarmState OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX INTEGER {
- noAlarm(1),
-
-
-
-
-
- Masuma Ahmed and Kaj Tesink (editors) Expires 4/19/94[Page 28]
-
-
-
-
-
- Internet Draft ATM Management Objects October 19, 1993
-
-
- receivedFarEndAlarm(2),
- incomingLOF(3)
- }
- MAX-ACCESS read-only
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "This variable indicates if there is an
- alarm present for the DS3 PLCP. The value
- receivedFarEndAlarm means that the DS3 PLCP
- has received an incoming Yellow
- Signal, the value incomingLOF means that
- the DS3 PLCP has declared a loss of frame (LOF)
- failure condition, and the value noAlarm
- means that there are no alarms present."
- ::= { atmInterfaceDs3PlcpEntry 3}
-
- atmInterfaceDs3PlcpUASs OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX Counter32
- MAX-ACCESS read-only
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "The counter associated with the number of
- Unavailable Seconds encountered by the PLCP."
- ::= { atmInterfaceDs3PlcpEntry 4}
-
-
- -- The ATM Interface TC Sublayer Group
-
- -- Implementation of this group is mandatory
- -- if TC Sublayer is implemented.
-
-
-
- atmInterfaceTCTable OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF AtmInterfaceTCEntry
- MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "This table contains ATM interface TC
- Sublayer parameters and state variables,
- one entry per ATM interface port."
- ::= { atmMIBObjects 4}
-
- atmInterfaceTCEntry OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX AtmInterfaceTCEntry
-
-
-
-
-
- Masuma Ahmed and Kaj Tesink (editors) Expires 4/19/94[Page 29]
-
-
-
-
-
- Internet Draft ATM Management Objects October 19, 1993
-
-
- MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "This list contains TC Sublayer parameters
- and state variables at the ATM interface."
- INDEX {atmInterfaceTCIndex }
- ::= { atmInterfaceTCTable 1}
-
- AtmInterfaceTCEntry ::= SEQUENCE {
- atmInterfaceTCIndex IfIndex,
- atmInterfaceOCDEvents Counter32,
- atmInterfaceTCAlarmState INTEGER
- }
-
- atmInterfaceTCIndex OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX IfIndex
- MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "The value of this object identifies the ATM
- interface port for which this entry
- contains management information and is
- the same as the atmInterfaceIndex."
- ::= { atmInterfaceTCEntry 1}
-
- atmInterfaceOCDEvents OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX Counter32
- MAX-ACCESS read-only
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "The number of times the Out of Cell
- Delineation (OCD) events occur. If seven
- consecutive ATM cells have Header Error
- Control (HEC) violations, an OCD event occurs.
- A high number of OCD events may indicate a problem
- with the TC Sublayer."
- ::= { atmInterfaceTCEntry 2}
-
-
- atmInterfaceTCAlarmState OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX INTEGER {
- noAlarm(1),
- lcdFailure(2)
- }
- MAX-ACCESS read-only
-
-
-
-
-
- Masuma Ahmed and Kaj Tesink (editors) Expires 4/19/94[Page 30]
-
-
-
-
-
- Internet Draft ATM Management Objects October 19, 1993
-
-
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "This variable indicates if there is an
- alarm present for the TC Sublayer. The value
- lcdFailure indicates that a Loss of
- Cell Delineation (LCD) failure state has been
- declared for the TC Sublayer."
- ::= { atmInterfaceTCEntry 3}
-
-
-
- -- ATM Virtual Path Connection (VPC) Group
- -- Implementation of this group is mandatory if providing
- -- an ATM Virtual Path Connection at an ATM interface.
- -- This group provides configuration information of the
- -- VPC segment.
-
- -- Note: This group is under review.
- -- See IETF Amsterdam AToM MIB WG meeting report.
-
-
- atmVPConnectionTable OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF AtmVPConnectionTableEntry
- MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "This table contains ATM VPC configuration and
- performance parameters and state variables.
- Each entry represents a unidirectional
- traffic flow. Multiple entries are necessary
- to represent a bidirectional and multipoint
- connections."
- ::= { atmMIBObjects 7 }
-
- atmVPConnectionTableEntry OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX AtmVPConnectionTableEntry
- MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "A unidirectional traffic flow."
- INDEX {atmVPConnectionIngressPort, atmVPConnectionIngressVpi,
- atmVPConnectionEgressPort, atmVPConnectionEgressVpi }
- ::= { atmVPConnectionTable 1}
-
- AtmVPConnectionTableEntry ::=
-
-
-
-
-
- Masuma Ahmed and Kaj Tesink (editors) Expires 4/19/94[Page 31]
-
-
-
-
-
- Internet Draft ATM Management Objects October 19, 1993
-
-
- SEQUENCE {
- atmVPConnectionTableEntryStatus RowStatus,
- atmVPConnectionIngressPort IfIndex,
- atmVPConnectionIngressVpi INTEGER,
- atmVPConnectionEgressPort IfIndex,
- atmVPConnectionEgressVpi INTEGER,
- atmVPConnectionOperStatus INTEGER,
- atmVPConnectionAdminStatus INTEGER,
- atmVPConnectionTrafficShaperType OBJECT IDENTIFIER,
- atmVPConnectionTrafficShaperParam1 INTEGER,
- atmVPConnectionTrafficShaperParam2 INTEGER,
- atmVPConnectionTrafficShaperParam3 INTEGER,
- atmVPConnectionTrafficShaperParam4 INTEGER,
- atmVPConnectionTrafficShaperParam5 INTEGER,
- atmVPConnectionTrafficPolicerType OBJECT IDENTIFIER,
- atmVPConnectionTrafficPolicerParam1 INTEGER,
- atmVPConnectionTrafficPolicerParam2 INTEGER,
- atmVPConnectionTrafficPolicerParam3 INTEGER,
- atmVPConnectionTrafficPolicerParam4 INTEGER,
- atmVPConnectionTrafficPolicerParam5 INTEGER,
- atmVPConnectionQoSClass INTEGER
- }
-
- atmVPConnectionTableEntryStatus OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX RowStatus
- MAX-ACCESS read-create
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "The status column used for creating,
- modifying, and deleting instances of the
- supplemental objects in the conceptual
- row of the virtual connection table."
- DEFVAL { active }
- ::= { atmVPConnectionTableEntry 1 }
-
- atmVPConnectionIngressPort OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX IfIndex
- MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "The value of this object identifies the ingress ATM
- port of the VPC segment."
- ::= { atmVPConnectionTableEntry 2 }
-
- atmVPConnectionIngressVpi OBJECT-TYPE
-
-
-
-
-
- Masuma Ahmed and Kaj Tesink (editors) Expires 4/19/94[Page 32]
-
-
-
-
-
- Internet Draft ATM Management Objects October 19, 1993
-
-
- SYNTAX INTEGER (1..255)
- MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "The VPI value at the ingress port of
- the traffic flow. The VPI=0 is reserved
- for VCC. The maximum VPI value
- cannot exceed the number allowed
- by the atmInterfaceMaxVpiBits
- specified for the ingress ATM port."
- ::= { atmVPConnectionTableEntry 3 }
-
- atmVPConnectionEgressPort OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX IfIndex
- MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "The value of this object identifies the ingress ATM
- port of the VPC segment."
- ::= { atmVPConnectionTableEntry 4 }
-
- atmVPConnectionEgressVpi OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX INTEGER (1..255)
- MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "The VPI value at the egress port of the
- traffic flow. The VPI=0 is reserved
- for VCC. The maximum VPI value
- cannot exceed the number supported
- by the atmInterfaceMaxVpiBits
- specified for the egress ATM port."
- ::= { atmVPConnectionTableEntry 5 }
-
- atmVPConnectionOperStatus OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX INTEGER {
- up(1),
- down(2)
- }
- MAX-ACCESS read-only
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "This object indicates the operational status
- of the VPC, i.e., whether the managed
- segment of the VPC is up or down.
-
-
-
-
-
- Masuma Ahmed and Kaj Tesink (editors) Expires 4/19/94[Page 33]
-
-
-
-
-
- Internet Draft ATM Management Objects October 19, 1993
-
-
- In the down state, no cells can be passed across
- this segment of the VPC."
- ::= { atmVPConnectionTableEntry 6 }
-
- atmVPConnectionAdminStatus OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX INTEGER {
- up(1),
- down(2)
- }
- MAX-ACCESS read-write
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "This object indicates the desired status of the
- VPC, i.e., whether the managed segment of the
- VPC is up or down. In the down state, no cells
- can be passed across this segment of the VPC."
- ::= { atmVPConnectionTableEntry 7 }
-
-
- atmVPConnectionTrafficShaperType OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX OBJECT IDENTIFIER
- MAX-ACCESS read-write
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "The value of this object identifies the type
- of traffic shaping algorithm active on
- the egress of the traffic flow.
- The type may indicate no traffic shaping or
- traffic shaping with one or more parameters.
- These parameters are specified as a parameter
- vector, in the corresponding instances of the objects:
- atmVPConnectionTrafficShaperParam1
- atmVPConnectionTrafficShaperParam2
- atmVPConnectionTrafficShaperParam3
- atmVPConnectionTrafficShaperParam4
- atmVPConnectionTrafficShaperParam5."
- ::= { atmVPConnectionTableEntry 8}
-
- atmVPConnectionTrafficShaperParam1 OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX INTEGER (0..2147483647)
- MAX-ACCESS read-write
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "The first parameter of the traffic shaper
- for this VPC segment used according to the value of
-
-
-
-
-
- Masuma Ahmed and Kaj Tesink (editors) Expires 4/19/94[Page 34]
-
-
-
-
-
- Internet Draft ATM Management Objects October 19, 1993
-
-
- atmVPConnectionTrafficShaperType."
- ::= { atmVPConnectionTableEntry 9}
-
- atmVPConnectionTrafficShaperParam2 OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX INTEGER (0..2147483647)
- MAX-ACCESS read-write
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "The second parameter of the traffic shaper
- for this VPC segment used according to the value of
- atmVPConnectionTrafficShaperType."
- ::= { atmVPConnectionTableEntry 10}
-
- atmVPConnectionTrafficShaperParam3 OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX INTEGER (0..2147483647)
- MAX-ACCESS read-write
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "The third parameter of the traffic shaper
- for this VPC segment used according to the value of
- atmVPConnectionTrafficShaperType."
- ::= { atmVPConnectionTableEntry 11}
-
- atmVPConnectionTrafficShaperParam4 OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX INTEGER (0..2147483647)
- MAX-ACCESS read-write
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "The fourth parameter of the traffic shaper for
- this VPC segment used according to the value of
- atmVPConnectionTrafficShaperType."
- ::= { atmVPConnectionTableEntry 12}
-
- atmVPConnectionTrafficShaperParam5 OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX INTEGER (0..2147483647)
- MAX-ACCESS read-write
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "The fifth parameter of the traffic shaper for
- this VPC segment used according to the value of
- atmVPConnectionTrafficShaperType."
- ::= { atmVPConnectionTableEntry 13}
-
- atmVPConnectionTrafficPolicerType OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX OBJECT IDENTIFIER
-
-
-
-
-
- Masuma Ahmed and Kaj Tesink (editors) Expires 4/19/94[Page 35]
-
-
-
-
-
- Internet Draft ATM Management Objects October 19, 1993
-
-
- MAX-ACCESS read-write
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "The value of this object identifies the type
- of traffic policing algorithm active on
- the ingress of this traffic flow.
- The type may indicate no
- traffic policing or traffic policing with one
- or more parameters.
- These parameters are specified as a parameter
- vector, in the corresponding instances of the objects:
- atmVPConnectionTrafficPolicerParam1
- atmVPConnectionTrafficPolicerParam2
- atmVPConnectionTrafficPolicerParam3
- atmVPConnectionTrafficPolicerParam4
- atmVPConnectionTrafficPolicerParam5."
- ::= { atmVPConnectionTableEntry 14}
-
- atmVPConnectionTrafficPolicerParam1 OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX INTEGER (0..2147483647)
- MAX-ACCESS read-write
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "The first parameter of the traffic policer
- for this VPC segment used according to the value of
- atmVPConnectionTrafficPolicerType."
- ::= { atmVPConnectionTableEntry 15}
-
- atmVPConnectionTrafficPolicerParam2 OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX INTEGER (0..2147483647)
- MAX-ACCESS read-write
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "The second parameter of the traffic policing
- for this VPC segment used according to the value of
- atmVPConnectionTrafficPolicerType."
- ::= { atmVPConnectionTableEntry 16}
-
- atmVPConnectionTrafficPolicerParam3 OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX INTEGER (0..2147483647)
- MAX-ACCESS read-write
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "The third parameter of the traffic policer
- for this VPC segment used according to the value of
-
-
-
-
-
- Masuma Ahmed and Kaj Tesink (editors) Expires 4/19/94[Page 36]
-
-
-
-
-
- Internet Draft ATM Management Objects October 19, 1993
-
-
- atmVPConnectionTrafficPolicerType."
- ::= { atmVPConnectionTableEntry 17}
-
- atmVPConnectionTrafficPolicerParam4 OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX INTEGER (0..2147483647)
- MAX-ACCESS read-write
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "The fourth parameter of the traffic policing
- algorithm for this VPC segment
- used according to the value of
- atmVPConnectionTrafficPolicerType."
- ::= { atmVPConnectionTableEntry 18}
-
- atmVPConnectionTrafficPolicerParam5 OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX INTEGER (0..2147483647)
- MAX-ACCESS read-write
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "The fifth parameter of the traffic policing algorithm
- for this VPC segment used according to the value of
- atmVPConnectionTrafficPolicerType."
- ::= { atmVPConnectionTableEntry 19}
-
- atmVPConnectionQoSClass OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX INTEGER {
- unspecified(5),
- class1(1),
- class2(2),
- class3(3),
- class4(4) }
- MAX-ACCESS read-write
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "The value of this object identifies the QoS Class
- associated with this traffic flow.
- Four QoS classes have been specified
- in the ATM Forum UNI Specification
- Document, Draft 2.3 to
- support service class A (constant bit rate video
- and circuit emulation), service class B
- (variable bit rate video/audio),
- service class C (connection-oriented
- data) and service class D (connectionless data).
- The value unspecified indicates that this VPC has
-
-
-
-
-
- Masuma Ahmed and Kaj Tesink (editors) Expires 4/19/94[Page 37]
-
-
-
-
-
- Internet Draft ATM Management Objects October 19, 1993
-
-
- unspecified QoS Class."
- ::= {atmVPConnectionTableEntry 20}
-
-
-
-
- -- ATM Virtual Channel Connection (VCC) Group
- -- Implementation of this group is mandatory if providing
- -- an ATM Virtual Channel Connections at an ATM interface.
- -- This group provides configuration information of the
- -- VCC segment information.
-
-
- atmVCConnectionTable OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF AtmVCConnectionTableEntry
- MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "This table contains ATM VCC configuration and
- performance parameters and state variables.
- Each entry represents a unidirectional
- traffic flow. Multiple entries are necessary
- to represent a bidirectional and multipoint
- connections."
- ::= { atmMIBObjects 8 }
-
- atmVCConnectionTableEntry OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX AtmVCConnectionTableEntry
- MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "A unidirectional traffic flow."
- INDEX {atmVCConnectionIngressPort, atmVCConnectionIngressVpi,
- atmVCConnectionIngressVci, atmVCConnectionEgressPort,
- atmVCConnectionEgressVpi, atmVCConnectionEgressVci }
- ::= { atmVCConnectionTable 1}
-
- AtmVCConnectionTableEntry ::=
- SEQUENCE {
- atmVCConnectionTableEntryStatus RowStatus,
- atmVCConnectionIngressPort IfIndex,
- atmVCConnectionIngressVpi INTEGER,
- atmVCConnectionIngressVci INTEGER,
- atmVCConnectionEgressPort IfIndex,
- atmVCConnectionEgressVpi INTEGER,
-
-
-
-
-
- Masuma Ahmed and Kaj Tesink (editors) Expires 4/19/94[Page 38]
-
-
-
-
-
- Internet Draft ATM Management Objects October 19, 1993
-
-
- atmVCConnectionEgressVci INTEGER,
- atmVCConnectionOperStatus INTEGER,
- atmVCConnectionAdminStatus INTEGER,
- atmVCConnectionTrafficShaperType OBJECT IDENTIFIER,
- atmVCConnectionTrafficShaperParam1 INTEGER,
- atmVCConnectionTrafficShaperParam2 INTEGER,
- atmVCConnectionTrafficShaperParam3 INTEGER,
- atmVCConnectionTrafficShaperParam4 INTEGER,
- atmVCConnectionTrafficShaperParam5 INTEGER,
- atmVCConnectionTrafficPolicerType OBJECT IDENTIFIER,
- atmVCConnectionTrafficPolicerParam1 INTEGER,
- atmVCConnectionTrafficPolicerParam2 INTEGER,
- atmVCConnectionTrafficPolicerParam3 INTEGER,
- atmVCConnectionTrafficPolicerParam4 INTEGER,
- atmVCConnectionTrafficPolicerParam5 INTEGER,
- atmVCConnectionQoSClass INTEGER
- }
-
- atmVCConnectionTableEntryStatus OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX RowStatus
- MAX-ACCESS read-create
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "The status column used for creating,
- modifying, and deleting instances of the
- supplemental objects of the conceptual row in the
- virtual channel connection table."
- DEFVAL { active }
- ::= { atmVCConnectionTableEntry 1 }
-
- atmVCConnectionIngressPort OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX IfIndex
- MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "The value of this object identifies the ingress ATM
- port of the VCC segment."
- ::= { atmVCConnectionTableEntry 2 }
-
- atmVCConnectionIngressVpi OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX INTEGER (0..255)
- MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "The VPI value at the ingress
-
-
-
-
-
- Masuma Ahmed and Kaj Tesink (editors) Expires 4/19/94[Page 39]
-
-
-
-
-
- Internet Draft ATM Management Objects October 19, 1993
-
-
- port of the traffic flow. The
- maximum VPI value cannot exceed
- the number supported by the
- atmInterfaceMaxVpiBits
- at the ingress ATM port."
- ::= { atmVCConnectionTableEntry 3 }
-
- atmVCConnectionIngressVci OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX INTEGER (32..65535)
- MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "The VCI value at the ingress port of the
- traffic flow. The VCI values from 0 to 31
- are reserved. The maximum VCI value
- cannot exceed the number supported
- by the atmInterfaceMaxVciBits
- specified for the ingress ATM port."
- ::= { atmVCConnectionTableEntry 4 }
-
- atmVCConnectionEgressPort OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX IfIndex
- MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "The value of this object identifies the ingress ATM
- port of the VCC segment."
- ::= { atmVCConnectionTableEntry 5 }
-
- atmVCConnectionEgressVpi OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX INTEGER (0..255)
- MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "The VPI value at the egress port of the
- traffic flow. The maximum VPI value
- cannot exceed the number supported by
- the atmInterfaceMaxVpiBits at the egress ATM port."
- ::= { atmVCConnectionTableEntry 6 }
-
- atmVCConnectionEgressVci OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX INTEGER (32..65535)
- MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
-
-
-
-
-
- Masuma Ahmed and Kaj Tesink (editors) Expires 4/19/94[Page 40]
-
-
-
-
-
- Internet Draft ATM Management Objects October 19, 1993
-
-
- "The VCI value at the egress port of the
- traffic flow. The VCI values from 0 to 31
- are reserved. The maximum VCI value cannot
- exceed the number supported by
- the atmInterfaceMaxVciBits specified
- for the egress ATM port."
- ::= { atmVCConnectionTableEntry 7 }
-
- atmVCConnectionOperStatus OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX INTEGER {
- up(1),
- down(2) }
- MAX-ACCESS read-only
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "This object indicates the operational status
- of the VCC, i.e., whether the managed VCC
- segment is up or down. In the down state,
- no cells can be passed across this VCC
- segment."
- ::= { atmVCConnectionTableEntry 8 }
-
- atmVCConnectionAdminStatus OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX INTEGER {
- up(1),
- down(2) }
- MAX-ACCESS read-write
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "This object indicates the desired status
- of the VCC, i.e., whether the managed VCC
- segment is up or down. In the down state,
- no cells can be passed across this VCC
- segment."
- ::= { atmVCConnectionTableEntry 9 }
-
- atmVCConnectionTrafficShaperType OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX OBJECT IDENTIFIER
- MAX-ACCESS read-write
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "The value of this object identifies the type
- of traffic shaping algorithm active on
- the egress of the traffic flow.
- The type may indicate no
-
-
-
-
-
- Masuma Ahmed and Kaj Tesink (editors) Expires 4/19/94[Page 41]
-
-
-
-
-
- Internet Draft ATM Management Objects October 19, 1993
-
-
- traffic shaping or traffic shaping with one or
- more parameters.
- These parameters are specified as a parameter
- vector, in the corresponding instances of the objects:
- atmVCConnectionTrafficShaperParam1
- atmVCConnectionTrafficShaperParam2
- atmVCConnectionTrafficShaperParam3
- atmVCConnectionTrafficShaperParam4
- atmVCConnectionTrafficShaperParam5."
- ::= { atmVCConnectionTableEntry 10}
-
- atmVCConnectionTrafficShaperParam1 OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX INTEGER (0..2147483647)
- MAX-ACCESS read-write
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "The first parameter of the traffic shaper
- for this VCC segment used according to the value of
- atmVPConnectionTrafficShaperType."
- ::= { atmVCConnectionTableEntry 11}
-
- atmVCConnectionTrafficShaperParam2 OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX INTEGER (0..2147483647)
- MAX-ACCESS read-write
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "The second parameter of the traffic shaper
- for this VCC segment used according to the value of
- atmVPConnectionTrafficShaperType."
- ::= { atmVCConnectionTableEntry 12}
-
- atmVCConnectionTrafficShaperParam3 OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX INTEGER (0..2147483647)
- MAX-ACCESS read-write
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "The third parameter of the traffic shaper
- for this VCC segment used according to the value of
- atmVPConnectionTrafficShaperType."
- ::= { atmVCConnectionTableEntry 13}
-
- atmVCConnectionTrafficShaperParam4 OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX INTEGER (0..2147483647)
- MAX-ACCESS read-write
- STATUS current
-
-
-
-
-
- Masuma Ahmed and Kaj Tesink (editors) Expires 4/19/94[Page 42]
-
-
-
-
-
- Internet Draft ATM Management Objects October 19, 1993
-
-
- DESCRIPTION
- "The fourth parameter of the traffic shaper for
- this VCC segment used according to the value of
- atmVCConnectionTrafficShaperType."
- ::= { atmVCConnectionTableEntry 14}
-
- atmVCConnectionTrafficShaperParam5 OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX INTEGER (0..2147483647)
- MAX-ACCESS read-write
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "The fifth parameter of the traffic shaper for
- this VCC segment used according to the value of
- atmVCConnectionTrafficShaperType."
- ::= { atmVCConnectionTableEntry 15}
-
- atmVCConnectionTrafficPolicerType OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX OBJECT IDENTIFIER
- MAX-ACCESS read-write
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "The value of this object identifies the type
- of traffic policing algorithm active on
- the ingress of the traffic flow.
- The type may indicate no
- traffic policing or traffic policing with one
- or more parameters.
- These parameters are specified as a parameter
- vector, in the corresponding instances of the objects:
- atmVCConnectionTrafficPolicerParam1
- atmVCConnectionTrafficPolicerParam2
- atmVCConnectionTrafficPolicerParam3
- atmVCConnectionTrafficPolicerParam4
- atmVCConnectionTrafficPolicerParam5."
- ::= { atmVCConnectionTableEntry 16}
-
- atmVCConnectionTrafficPolicerParam1 OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX INTEGER (0..2147483647)
- MAX-ACCESS read-write
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "The first parameter of the traffic policer
- for this VCC segment used according to the value of
- atmVCConnectionTrafficPolicerType."
- ::= { atmVCConnectionTableEntry 17}
-
-
-
-
-
- Masuma Ahmed and Kaj Tesink (editors) Expires 4/19/94[Page 43]
-
-
-
-
-
- Internet Draft ATM Management Objects October 19, 1993
-
-
- atmVCConnectionTrafficPolicerParam2 OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX INTEGER (0..2147483647)
- MAX-ACCESS read-write
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "The second parameter of the traffic policing
- for this VCC segment used according to the value of
- atmVCConnectionTrafficPolicerType."
- ::= { atmVCConnectionTableEntry 18}
-
- atmVCConnectionTrafficPolicerParam3 OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX INTEGER (0..2147483647)
- MAX-ACCESS read-write
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "The third parameter of the traffic policer
- for this VCC segment used according to the value of
- atmVCConnectionTrafficPolicerType."
- ::= { atmVCConnectionTableEntry 19}
-
- atmVCConnectionTrafficPolicerParam4 OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX INTEGER (0..2147483647)
- MAX-ACCESS read-write
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "The fourth parameter of the traffic policing
- algorithm for this VCC segment
- used according to the value of
- atmVCConnectionTrafficPolicerType."
- ::= { atmVCConnectionTableEntry 20}
-
- atmVCConnectionTrafficPolicerParam5 OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX INTEGER (0..2147483647)
- MAX-ACCESS read-write
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "The fifth parameter of the traffic policing algorithm
- for this VCC segment used according to the value of
- atmVCConnectionTrafficPolicerType."
- ::= { atmVCConnectionTableEntry 21}
-
- atmVCConnectionQoSClass OBJECT-TYPE
- SYNTAX INTEGER {
- unspecified(5),
- class1(1),
-
-
-
-
-
- Masuma Ahmed and Kaj Tesink (editors) Expires 4/19/94[Page 44]
-
-
-
-
-
- Internet Draft ATM Management Objects October 19, 1993
-
-
- class2(2),
- class3(3),
- class4(4) }
- MAX-ACCESS read-write
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "The value of this object identifies the QoS Class
- associated with the originating VCL of the VCC.
- Four QoS classes have been specified
- in the ATM Forum UNI Specification
- Document, Draft 2.3 to
- support service class A (constant bit rate video
- and circuit emulation), service class B
- (variable bit rate video/audio),
- service class C (connection-oriented
- data) and service class D (connectionless data).
- The value unspecified indicates that this VCC has
- unspecified QoS Class."
- ::= {atmVCConnectionTableEntry 22}
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Masuma Ahmed and Kaj Tesink (editors) Expires 4/19/94[Page 45]
-
-
-
-
-
- Internet Draft ATM Management Objects October 19, 1993
-
-
- -- Conformance Information
-
- atmMIBConformance OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { atmMIB 2 }
-
- atmMIBGroups OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { atmMIBConformance 1 }
- atmMIBCompliances OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { atmMIBConformance 2 }
-
-
- -- Compliance Statements
-
- atmMIBCompliance MODULE-COMPLIANCE
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "The compliance statement for SNMP entities
- which have ATM interfaces."
-
- MODULE -- this module
- MANDATORY-GROUPS { atmInterfaceConfGroup }
-
- GROUP atmInterfaceDs3PlcpGroup
- DESCRIPTION
- "This group is mandatory only for those
- ATM interfaces which implement the
- DS3 PLCP layer."
-
- GROUP atmInterfaceTCGroup
- DESCRIPTION
- "This group is mandatory only for those
- ATM interfaces which implement the
- TC Sublayer."
-
- GROUP atmInterfaceVpcGroup
- DESCRIPTION
- "This group is mandatory only for those
- ATM interfaces which implement
- ATM VPC segments."
-
- GROUP atmInterfaceVccGroup
- DESCRIPTION
- "This group is mandatory only for those
- ATM interfaces which implement
- ATM VCC segments."
- ::= { atmMIBCompliances 1 }
-
- -- Units of Conformance
-
-
-
-
-
- Masuma Ahmed and Kaj Tesink (editors) Expires 4/19/94[Page 46]
-
-
-
-
-
- Internet Draft ATM Management Objects October 19, 1993
-
-
- atmInterfaceConfGroup OBJECT-GROUP
- OBJECTS {atmInterfaceMaxVpcs, atmInterfaceMaxVccs,
- atmInterfaceConfVpcs, atmInterfaceConfVccs,
- atmInterfaceMaxActiveVpiBits,
- atmInterfaceMaxActiveVciBits,
- atmInterfaceIlmiVpiVci }
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "A collection of objects providing configuration
- information about an ATM interface."
- ::= { atmMIBGroups 1 }
-
- atmInterfaceDs3PlcpGroup OBJECT-GROUP
- OBJECTS {atmInterfaceDs3PlcpSEFSs,
- atmInterfaceDs3PlcpAlarmState,
- atmInterfaceDs3PlcpUASs}
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "A collection of objects providing
- information about DS3 PLCP layer at an ATM interface."
- ::= { atmMIBGroups 2 }
-
- atmInterfaceTCGroup OBJECT-GROUP
- OBJECTS { atmInterfaceOCDEvents,
- atmInterfaceTCAlarmState }
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "A collection of objects providing
- information about the TC sublayer at
- an ATM interface."
- ::= { atmMIBGroups 3 }
-
- atmInterfaceVpcGroup OBJECT-GROUP
- OBJECTS {atmVPConnectionTableEntryStatus,
- atmVPConnectionOperStatus,
- atmVPConnectionAdminStatus,
- atmVPConnectionTrafficShaperType,
- atmVPConnectionTrafficShaperParam1,
- atmVPConnectionTrafficShaperParam2,
- atmVPConnectionTrafficShaperParam3,
- atmVPConnectionTrafficShaperParam4,
- atmVPConnectionTrafficShaperParam5,
- atmVPConnectionTrafficPolicerType,
- atmVPConnectionTrafficPolicerParam1,
- atmVPConnectionTrafficPolicerParam2,
-
-
-
-
-
- Masuma Ahmed and Kaj Tesink (editors) Expires 4/19/94[Page 47]
-
-
-
-
-
- Internet Draft ATM Management Objects October 19, 1993
-
-
- atmVPConnectionTrafficPolicerParam3,
- atmVPConnectionTrafficPolicerParam4,
- atmVPConnectionTrafficPolicerParam5,
- atmVPConnectionQoSClass }
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "A collection of objects providing
- information about the VPC at an ATM interface."
- ::= { atmMIBGroups 4 }
-
- atmInterfaceVccGroup OBJECT-GROUP
- OBJECTS {atmVCConnectionTableEntryStatus,
- atmVCConnectionOperStatus,
- atmVCConnectionAdminStatus,
- atmVCConnectionTrafficShaperType,
- atmVCConnectionTrafficShaperParam1,
- atmVCConnectionTrafficShaperParam2,
- atmVCConnectionTrafficShaperParam3,
- atmVCConnectionTrafficShaperParam4,
- atmVCConnectionTrafficShaperParam5,
- atmVCConnectionTrafficPolicerType,
- atmVCConnectionTrafficPolicerParam1,
- atmVCConnectionTrafficPolicerParam2,
- atmVCConnectionTrafficPolicerParam3,
- atmVCConnectionTrafficPolicerParam4,
- atmVCConnectionTrafficPolicerParam5,
- atmVCConnectionQoSClass }
- STATUS current
- DESCRIPTION
- "A collection of objects providing
- information about the VCC at an ATM interface."
- ::= { atmMIBGroups 5 }
-
- END
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Masuma Ahmed and Kaj Tesink (editors) Expires 4/19/94[Page 48]
-
-
-
-
-
- Internet Draft ATM Management Objects October 19, 1993
-
-
- 11. Acknowledgments
-
- This memo is the result of the work of the AToMMIB Working
- Group.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Masuma Ahmed and Kaj Tesink (editors) Expires 4/19/94[Page 49]
-
-
-
-
-
- Internet Draft ATM Management Objects October 19, 1993
-
-
- 12. References
-
- [1] K. McCloghrie and M.T. Rose, Management Information Base
- for Network Management of TCP/IP-based internets,
- Internet Working Group Request for Comments 1156.
- Network Information Center, SRI International, Menlo
- Park, California, (May 1990).
-
- [2] M.T. Rose (editor), Management Information Base for
- Network Management of TCP/IP-based internets, Internet
- Working Group Request for Comments 1213. Network
- Information Center, SRI International, Menlo Park,
- California, (March 1991).
-
- [3] Information processing systems - Open Systems
- Interconnection - Specification of Abstract Syntax
- Notation One (ASN.1), International Organization for
- Standardization. International Standard 8824, (December
- 1987).
-
- [4] Information processing systems - Open Systems
- Interconnection - Specification of Basic Encoding Rules
- for Abstract Syntax Notation One (ASN.1), International
- Organization for Standardization. International Standard
- 8825, (December, 1987).
-
- [5] K. McCloghrie and F. Kastenholz, Evolution of Interfaces
- Group of MIB-II, Internet Draft, September 1993.
-
- [6] T. Cox and K. Tesink, Definitions of Managed Objects for
- SIP Interface Type, RFC1304, Network Information Center,
- SRI International, Menlo Park, California, February 1992.
-
- [7] J. Case, K. McCloghrie, M. Rose, and S. Waldbusser,
- Structure of Management Information for SNMPv2, RFC1442,
- Network Information Center, SRI International, Menlo
- Park, California, April 1993.
-
- [8] J. Case, K. McCloghrie, M. Rose, and S. Waldbusser,
- Textual Conventions for SNMPv2, RFC1443, Network
- Information Center, SRI International, Menlo Park,
- California, April 1993.
-
- [9] J. Case, K. McCloghrie, M. Rose, and S. Waldbusser,
- Conformance Statements for SNMPv2, RFC1444, Network
-
-
-
-
-
- Masuma Ahmed and Kaj Tesink (editors) Expires 4/19/94[Page 50]
-
-
-
-
-
- Internet Draft ATM Management Objects October 19, 1993
-
-
- Information Center, SRI International, Menlo Park,
- California, April 1993.
-
- [10] J. Galvin and K. McCloghrie, Administrative Model for
- SNMPv2, RFC1445, Network Information Center, SRI
- International, Menlo Park, California, April 1993.
-
- [11] J. Case, K. McCloghrie, M. Rose, and S. Waldbusser,
- Protocol Operations for SNMPv2, RFC1448, Network
- Information Center, SRI International, Menlo Park,
- California, April 1993.
-
- [12] ATM Forum UNI Specification Document, Version 3,
- September 1993.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Masuma Ahmed and Kaj Tesink (editors) Expires 4/19/94[Page 51]
-
-
-
-
-
- Internet Draft ATM Management Objects October 19, 1993
-
-
- 13. Security Considerations
-
- Security issues are not discussed in this memo.
-
-
- 14. Authors' Addresses
-
- Masuma Ahmed
- Bell Communications Research
- Room 1F-217
- 331 Newman Springs Road
- P.O. Box 7020
- Red Bank, NJ 07701-7020
- Phone: (908) 758-2515
- EMail: mxa@mail.bellcore.com
-
-
- Kaj Tesink
- Bell Communications Research
- Room 1A-427
- 331 Newman Springs Road
- P.O. Box 7020
- Red Bank, NJ 07701-7020
- Phone: (908) 758-5254
- EMail: kaj@cc.bellcore.com
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Masuma Ahmed and Kaj Tesink (editors) Expires 4/19/94[Page 52]
-
-
-
-
-
- Internet Draft ATM Management Objects October 19, 1993
-
-
- Table of Contents
-
-
- 1 Status of this Memo ................................... 1
- 2 Abstract .............................................. 2
- 3 Change Log ............................................ 2
- 4 The SNMPv2 Network Management Framework ............... 4
- 5 Objects ............................................... 5
- 5.1 Format of Definitions ............................... 5
- 6 ATM Terminology ....................................... 6
- 6.1 VCL/VPL and VCC/VPC ................................. 6
- 6.2 PVC and SVC ......................................... 8
- 6.3 Traffic Management Parameters ....................... 8
- 6.3.1 Traffic Policing and Traffic Shaping Parameters
- .................................................... 8
- 6.3.2 Cell Loss Priority ................................ 9
- 6.3.3 QoS Class ......................................... 9
- 7 Overview .............................................. 9
- 7.1 Background .......................................... 9
- 7.2 Structure of the MIB ................................ 10
- 7.3 ATM Interface Configuration Group ................... 10
- 7.4 ATM Interface DS3 PLCP and TC Layer Groups .......... 11
- 7.5 ATM Virtual Connection Segment Groups ............... 11
- 7.5.1 Introduction ...................................... 11
- 7.5.2 Virtual Connection Identifiers at Ingress and
- Egress ............................................. 13
- 7.5.3 Virtual Connection Characterization ............... 13
- 7.5.4 Sets .............................................. 14
- 7.5.5 Virtual Connection Association with Interface
- Addresses .......................................... 15
- 7.5.6 Management of an End-to-End Virtual Connection
- .................................................... 15
- 8 Application of MIB II to ATM .......................... 15
- 8.1 The System Group .................................... 15
- 8.2 The Interface Group ................................. 15
- 8.2.1 Support of the ATM Cell Layer by ifTable .......... 16
- 8.2.2 Support of the AAL3/4 by RFC 1304 ................. 17
- 8.2.3 Support of the AAL5 by ifTable and the ATM MIB
- .................................................... 17
- 9 ILMI MIB and The ATM Managed Objects .................. 17
- 10 Object Definitions ................................... 21
- 11 Acknowledgments ...................................... 49
- 12 References ........................................... 50
- 13 Security Considerations .............................. 52
- 14 Authors' Addresses ................................... 52
-
-
-
-
-
- Masuma Ahmed and Kaj Tesink (editors) Expires 4/19/94[Page 53]
-
-
-
-
-
- Internet Draft ATM Management Objects October 19, 1993
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Masuma Ahmed and Kaj Tesink (editors) Expires 4/19/94[Page 54]
-
-
-
-
-